<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>P-MART wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/ShenkRoush948</link>
		<description>From P-MART wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 17:43:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>User:ShenkRoush948</title>
			<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User:ShenkRoush948</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;ShenkRoush948:&amp;#32;Created page with 'First I'd much better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO immediately after comprehensive study and analysis by qualifi…'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;First I'd much better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO immediately after comprehensive study and analysis by qualified experts have failed to determine the object as any recognized natural or man-created phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' means that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a probable or doable natural or man-made phenomena, yet what exactly it was remains certainly 'unidentified' and in all probability forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs might be extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One may ague and come to a conclusion that although it is actually possible aliens would stumble more than our humble abode at the cosmos, it is actually particularly improbable that it would take place inside our lifetime; with the last couple of generations. It's vastly alot more doable a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, maybe millions if not billions of years ago. While there is something to be said for that, there's the counter argument that having visited once, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would develop into ongoing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fast forward a few billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or 2 for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens might have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions would be so rare, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will quite possibly forever stay merely wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct these days!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to extra current prehistoric eras, up via and which includes ancient history, say inside the last 100,000 years, then we may start getting several even more concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which naturally brings us to the subject of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on that's that various of the widespread literature on the subject is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it can be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes some thing like &amp;quot;That do not impress me significantly&amp;quot;. Specifically, as soon as watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the prevalent literature, I've never been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to create them - monuments for instance Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human skills short. I'm at the same time not impressed with so known as ancient technology - thousands of year old batteries as an example that appear about as alien as a Model T Ford.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does impress me are several incredibly anomalous and alien in look historical art works - photos, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, a few of large size for example the Nazca line drawings in Peru so certainly produced to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that can be suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy places for scholarly research, given the significance of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in recent generations - 1947 to date? Well, maybe there hasn't been - a surge that is.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:54:03 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>ShenkRoush948</dc:creator>			<comments>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User_talk:ShenkRoush948</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ShenkRoush948</title>
			<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=ShenkRoush948</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;ShenkRoush948:&amp;#32;Created page with 'First I'd much better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO immediately after comprehensive study and analysis by qualifi…'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;First I'd much better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO immediately after comprehensive study and analysis by qualified experts have failed to determine the object as any recognized natural or man-created phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' means that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a probable or doable natural or man-made phenomena, yet what exactly it was remains certainly 'unidentified' and in all probability forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs might be extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One may ague and come to a conclusion that although it is actually possible aliens would stumble more than our humble abode at the cosmos, it is actually particularly improbable that it would take place inside our lifetime; with the last couple of generations. It's vastly alot more doable a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, maybe millions if not billions of years ago. While there is something to be said for that, there's the counter argument that having visited once, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would develop into ongoing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fast forward a few billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or 2 for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens might have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions would be so rare, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will quite possibly forever stay merely wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct these days!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to extra current prehistoric eras, up via and which includes ancient history, say inside the last 100,000 years, then we may start getting several even more concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which naturally brings us to the subject of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on that's that various of the widespread literature on the subject is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it can be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes some thing like &amp;quot;That do not impress me significantly&amp;quot;. Specifically, as soon as watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the prevalent literature, I've never been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to create them - monuments for instance Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human skills short. I'm at the same time not impressed with so known as ancient technology - thousands of year old batteries as an example that appear about as alien as a Model T Ford.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does impress me are several incredibly anomalous and alien in look historical art works - photos, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, a few of large size for example the Nazca line drawings in Peru so certainly produced to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that can be suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy places for scholarly research, given the significance of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in recent generations - 1947 to date? Well, maybe there hasn't been - a surge that is.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:53:55 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>ShenkRoush948</dc:creator>			<comments>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=Talk:ShenkRoush948</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>