<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>P-MART wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/GretchenMccusker13</link>
		<description>From P-MART wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:52:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>User:GretchenMccusker13</title>
			<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User:GretchenMccusker13</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;GretchenMccusker13:&amp;#32;Created page with 'FAIRNESS played a central role in Barack Obama's state-of-the-union address, and I suspect it will play a central role in the president's re-election campaign. But what does Mr O…'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;FAIRNESS played a central role in Barack Obama's state-of-the-union address, and I suspect it will play a central role in the president's re-election campaign. But what does Mr Obama have in mind when he deploys the f-word? It may not be the case that fairness is, as Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert, puts it, &amp;quot;a concept invented so dumb people could participate in arguments&amp;quot;. But it cannot be denied that fairness is an idea both mutable and contested. Indeed, last week's state-of-the-union address seems to contain several distinct conceptions of fairness worth drawing out and reflecting upon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toward the beginning of his speech, as Mr Obama was trying to draw a parallel between post-second world war America and today's post-Iraq war America, he offered this rather stark choice:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well while a growing number of Americans barely get by, or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:20:50 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>GretchenMccusker13</dc:creator>			<comments>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User_talk:GretchenMccusker13</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GretchenMccusker13</title>
			<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=GretchenMccusker13</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;GretchenMccusker13:&amp;#32;Created page with 'FAIRNESS played a central role in Barack Obama's state-of-the-union address, and I suspect it will play a central role in the president's re-election campaign. But what does Mr O…'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;FAIRNESS played a central role in Barack Obama's state-of-the-union address, and I suspect it will play a central role in the president's re-election campaign. But what does Mr Obama have in mind when he deploys the f-word? It may not be the case that fairness is, as Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert, puts it, &amp;quot;a concept invented so dumb people could participate in arguments&amp;quot;. But it cannot be denied that fairness is an idea both mutable and contested. Indeed, last week's state-of-the-union address seems to contain several distinct conceptions of fairness worth drawing out and reflecting upon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toward the beginning of his speech, as Mr Obama was trying to draw a parallel between post-second world war America and today's post-Iraq war America, he offered this rather stark choice:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well while a growing number of Americans barely get by, or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:20:47 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>GretchenMccusker13</dc:creator>			<comments>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=Talk:GretchenMccusker13</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>