P-MART wiki - User contributions [en]

User:ArielRasmussen334

ArielRasmussen334 — Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:20:41 GMT

ArielRasmussen334: Created page with 'Scientific people have always enjoyed the idea of artificial intelligence--of a device having the capacity to think and act by itself. It is a popular theme for novels and movies…'

Scientific people have always enjoyed the idea of artificial intelligence--of a device having the capacity to think and act by itself. It is a popular theme for novels and movies too. And who of us wouldn't love to have your own robot to anticipate our needs and take care of them? I even remember a production from the local planetarium about computers worldwide that networked and synergized their data. At the conclusion of the assembly this networked computer commanded, "Let there be light!" along with a new universe came to be.

Artificial intelligence has as much definitions as people defining it. For some it is just a matter of a machine having the capacity to analyze data after which take a suitable action. However think for many, this means that a machine can in fact think, can learn, can create, will come track of original ideas--that it can behave like an individual and stay indistinguishable from a person in the actions and thoughts.

[http://www.robertsugar.com/ robotics london] - If artificial intelligence is just a machine or a system functioning on its own, a lawn sprinkler system which has a moisture meter to understand if it has rained or otherwise would be artificial intelligence. Whether it has rained, the sprinklers won't come on until the sensor becomes drier. But this technique may be developed to act this way, as well as the only reason it won't act this way is if it malfunctions. In no way is the fact that intelligent. The device is not thinking at all. It's doing what it really has been designed to do and contains not one other choice.

I maintain that the more popular definition of artificial intelligence--that a machine or system can think, decide, and create--is impossible.

First, a meaning of intelligence that I think most people would trust: Intelligence will be the power to learn; to possess experiences that teach the things that work and what doesn't. Then to adopt that learning and do something worthwhile by using it.

[http://www.robertsugar.com/ robotics london] - To genuinely learn something, a machine would require emotions. Individuals need emotions to learn too, and also, since we've them there is no end from what we could learn or what we can perform with your knowledge. Higher animals likewise have emotions and are in a position to learn. The less intelligent a living thing is, the greater instinctual it is, meaning it will things because it doesn't always have a choice--because it is less intelligent. Lower organisms like bacteria don't have emotions in any way, as far as we all know, and they act similar to machines which have been programmed than like living organisms. They don't really act as should they have a choice. They simply do what their genetic programming ensures they are do.

Machines do not have emotions and are not capable of getting them. An individual may program a machine to act as though it has emotions, but obviously it does not really have them. A machine could be designed to search the Internet, watch television and listen to radio broadcasting, read books and magazines, and listen to people speak. It may amass huge amounts of data and it can analyze those data and act. But only as it has been developed to act. It's plenty of data nevertheless it doesn't value them. It couldn't care less if dozens of data sat on its hard disk and zilch ever became of these. It couldn't care less if a person arrived and erased all those data. It can't shame weekly because everything effort had arrived at naught. So any machine or system that has to be programmed to act because it doesn't worry about acting otherwise, even thought it can be and do amazing things, is no more intelligent than the usual lawn sprinkler system having a moisture meter to point out if the sprinklers should run or otherwise not. And although all the "knowledge" on earth can be stored on computers, and computers could be networked together to maximise their capability, which will never create a God who are able to produce a new universe.

We people learn due to emotions. We want things. We need things. Folks have only one instinct: self-preservation. We learn items to keep ourselves alive and comfortable. We very often learn because of embarrassment or disappointment. We obtain pumped up about things and would like to know everything on them. I have spoken with 5-year-old children who knew more about dinosaurs than I'll ever know or want to know.

I saw a Nova program on PBS about separating conjoined twins. Among the twins stood a tracheotomy, and therefore didn't have voice. But she quickly learned to drag her sister's hair to ensure that her sister did the crying both for of them. She also, later, learned to pay for her throat with her hand in order that breath passed through her vocal cords. Each time she vocalized in this manner she smiled, happy with her capability to learn something and act intelligently.

[http://www.robertsugar.com/ virtual synthesis] - Individuals are authentically intelligent since they can and do learn something totally new by themselves, then figure out how to take their knowledge to make use of to preserve themselves, then to help others, then to try to make the whole human experience on Earth better. There is certainly a location in our midst for machines that may analyze data and act as they've been programmed, that is the extent of these worth.

Companies, parents, and governments should value people because they are people. Machines won't ever replace people. Treating people as extensions of technology will not result in success. Letting people use their intelligence and technology to do amazing things will lead to outrageous success.

It is extremely good to be a thinking, creating, choosing, feeling, remembering, self-actualizing, improving person. Nothing pleases me more than that I am a person.

ArielRasmussen334

ArielRasmussen334 — Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:20:14 GMT