<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>User:WalshRomero900 - Revision history</title>
		<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User:WalshRomero900&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 09:44:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>WalshRomero900:&amp;#32;Created page with 'First I'd far better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO immediately after comprehensive investigation and analysis by …'</title>
			<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User:WalshRomero900&amp;diff=74755&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;First I&amp;#39;d far better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO immediately after comprehensive investigation and analysis by …&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;First I'd far better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO immediately after comprehensive investigation and analysis by qualified authorities have failed to ascertain the object as any identified natural or man-produced phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' indicates that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a feasible or feasible natural or man-created phenomena, yet what precisely it was remains certainly 'unidentified' and possibly forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs can be extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One may ague and come to a conclusion that though it truly is possible aliens would stumble over our humble abode at the cosmos, it's particularly improbable that it would happen inside our lifetime; using the last few generations. It's vastly even more possible a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, perhaps millions if not billions of years ago. While there is some thing to be said for that, there is certainly the counter argument that having visited when, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would turn out to be ongoing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fast forward several billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or 2 for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens might possibly have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions could be so rare, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will probably forever remain merely wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct at this time!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to significantly more current prehistoric eras, up via and including ancient history, say inside the last 100,000 years, then we could possibly commence becoming some even more concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which naturally brings us towards the topic of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on that is that plenty of of the widespread literature on the subject is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it truly is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes something just like &amp;quot;That do not impress me much&amp;quot;. Specifically, as soon as watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the prevalent literature, I've in no way been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to build them - monuments which include Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human skills brief. I'm as well not impressed with so known as ancient technology - thousands of year old batteries as an example that look about as alien as a Model T Ford.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does impress me are numerous very anomalous and alien in look historical art works - pictures, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, several of huge size which include the Nazca line drawings in Peru so of course created to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that is often suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy places for scholarly analysis, given the significance of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in recent generations - 1947 to date? Well, maybe there hasn't been - a surge that's.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:46:15 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>WalshRomero900</dc:creator>			<comments>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User_talk:WalshRomero900</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>