<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>User:HeddieBrink81 - Revision history</title>
		<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User:HeddieBrink81&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 03:07:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>HeddieBrink81:&amp;#32;Created page with 'First I'd greater define precisely what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO right after comprehensive investigation and investigation by qualifi…'</title>
			<link>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User:HeddieBrink81&amp;diff=74756&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;First I&amp;#39;d greater define precisely what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO right after comprehensive investigation and investigation by qualifi…&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;First I'd greater define precisely what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO right after comprehensive investigation and investigation by qualified authorities have failed to decide the object as any identified natural or man-produced phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' means that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a doable or feasible natural or man-created phenomena, in spite of this what specifically it was remains certainly 'unidentified' and likely forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs may be extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One might ague and come to a conclusion that although it really is feasible aliens would stumble more than our humble abode at the cosmos, it is extremely improbable that it would occur within our lifetime; using the last few generations. It's vastly a great deal more doable a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, possibly millions if not billions of years ago. While there's some thing to be stated for that, there is the counter argument that having visited when, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would develop into ongoing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fast forward a couple of billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or two for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens may have been fascinated with the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions could be so rare, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will likely forever remain basically wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct currently!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to even more recent prehistoric eras, up by way of and including ancient history, say within the last 100,000 years, then we could commence becoming several significantly more concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which not surprisingly brings us to the subject of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on which is that a large number of of the widespread literature on the topic is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it can be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes some thing for example &amp;quot;That do not impress me significantly&amp;quot;. Specifically, when watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the widespread literature, I've never ever been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to construct them - monuments including Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human abilities brief. I'm too not impressed with so known as ancient technologies - thousands of year old batteries as an example that appear around as alien as a Model T Ford.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does impress me are numerous exceptionally anomalous and alien in look historical art works - photos, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, a few of big size including the Nazca line drawings in Peru so not surprisingly designed to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that can be suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy areas for scholarly analysis, given the importance of the topic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in current generations - 1947 to date? Well, perhaps there hasn't been - a surge that is.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:46:15 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>HeddieBrink81</dc:creator>			<comments>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=User_talk:HeddieBrink81</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>