<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=StaceeQualls26</id>
		<title>StaceeQualls26 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=StaceeQualls26"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=StaceeQualls26&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T13:56:19Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=StaceeQualls26&amp;diff=147911&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>StaceeQualls26:&amp;#32;Created page with 'Scientific people have always enjoyed the very thought of artificial intelligence--of a machine being able to think and act on its own. It's really a popular theme for novels and…'</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=StaceeQualls26&amp;diff=147911&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-08-23T15:21:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;Scientific people have always enjoyed the very thought of artificial intelligence--of a machine being able to think and act on its own. It&amp;#39;s really a popular theme for novels and…&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Scientific people have always enjoyed the very thought of artificial intelligence--of a machine being able to think and act on its own. It's really a popular theme for novels and films too. And who folks wouldn't like to own an individual robot can be expected our needs and take care of them? I even remember a production from your local planetarium about computers worldwide that networked and synergized their data. At the conclusion of the development this networked computer commanded, &amp;quot;Let there be light!&amp;quot; and a new universe was created.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial intelligence has as numerous definitions as people defining it. For many it is simply a matter of a piece of equipment having the capacity to analyze data then take an appropriate action. However think for most, this means a machine can certainly think, can learn, can make, may come on top of original ideas--that it could behave like a person and be indistinguishable from the individual in its actions and thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.robertsugar.com/ virtual synthesis] - If artificial intelligence is only a machine or perhaps a system working on its, then a lawn sprinkler system with a moisture meter to learn if it has rained or otherwise would be artificial intelligence. If it has rained, the sprinklers won't come on before the sensor dries out. But this system has been programmed to act this way, and also the only reason it won't act this way is that if it malfunctions. Certainly not is that intelligent. The system is not thinking at all. It really is doing what it has been developed to do and contains few other choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I maintain how the very popular concept of artificial intelligence--that a machine or system can think, decide, and create--is impossible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, a meaning of intelligence that I think a lot of people would accept: Intelligence may be the capability to learn; to have experiences that teach what works and what doesn't. Then to consider that learning and do something worthwhile from it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.robertsugar.com/ artificial intelligence london] - To genuinely learn something, a piece of equipment would want emotions. Young people need emotions to learn too, and since we've them there's no end from what we can learn or that which you can perform with our knowledge. Higher animals also provide emotions and so are in a position to learn. The less intelligent a living thing is, the more instinctual it's, meaning it will things because it doesn't always have a choice--because it's less intelligent. Lower organisms like bacteria do not have emotions in any way, so far as we realize, and so they act similar to machines which were programmed than like living organisms. They do not work as if they have a selection. They just do what their genetic programming means they are do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machines do not have emotions and are incompetent at getting them to. An individual can program a device to act as though it's emotions, but obviously it doesn't genuinely have them. A device could be developed to search the web, view television and pay attention to radio broadcasting, read magazines and books, and listen to people speak. It may amass huge amounts of data and it can analyze those data and act. Only because it has been developed to act. It has a lot of data nevertheless it doesn't care about them. It couldn't care less if all those data sat on its hard disk and nothing ever became of these. It couldn't care less if a person arrived and erased all those data. It would not feel bad for a week because everything that work had arrive at naught. So any machine or system that has got to be programmed to act because it doesn't worry about acting otherwise, even thought it can be and do amazing things, isn't any more intelligent when compared to a lawn sprinkler system using a moisture meter to point whether the sprinklers should run or otherwise. And although every one of the &amp;quot;knowledge&amp;quot; on earth could be stored on computers, and computers may be networked together to maximise their power, that may never create a God who can create a new universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We people learn as a result of emotions. We want things. We need things. Folks have only one instinct: self-preservation. We learn what to keep ourselves alive and comfy. We sometimes learn as a result of embarrassment or disappointment. We get looking forward to things and want to know everything about the subject. I have spoken with 5-year-old children who knew much more about dinosaurs than I am going to ever know or want to know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a Nova program on PBS about separating conjoined twins. Among the twins stood a tracheotomy, and so didn't have voice. But she quickly learned to tug her sister's hair in order that her sister did the crying both for of them. She also, later, learned to cover her throat with her hand to ensure that breath passed through her vocal cords. Each time she vocalized in this manner she smiled, happy with her ability to learn something and act intelligently.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.robertsugar.com/ artificial intelligence london] - Individuals are authentically intelligent since they can and do learn something totally new by themselves, after which figure out how to take their knowledge to use to preserve themselves, then to assist others, then to try and result in the whole human experience in the world better. There may be a spot in our midst for machines that will analyze data and work as they've been programmed, that is the extent of their worth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Companies, parents, and governments should value people because they're people. Machines will never replace people. Treating people as extensions of technology won't ever lead to success. Letting people use their intelligence and technology to do amazing things will result in outrageous success.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is very good to become thinking, creating, choosing, feeling, remembering, self-actualizing, improving person. Nothing pleases me more than that I'm a person.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>StaceeQualls26</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>