<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MabreyDobbs931</id>
		<title>MabreyDobbs931 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MabreyDobbs931"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=MabreyDobbs931&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-23T11:57:08Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=MabreyDobbs931&amp;diff=4958&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>MabreyDobbs931:&amp;#32;Created page with 'This subject is pretty simple and straightforward. I will keep it short and simple. Plasma has held the reigns for decades as far as picture quality goes. The very best LCD's com…'</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=MabreyDobbs931&amp;diff=4958&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-03-07T12:54:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;This subject is pretty simple and straightforward. I will keep it short and simple. Plasma has held the reigns for decades as far as picture quality goes. The very best LCD&amp;#39;s com…&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This subject is pretty simple and straightforward. I will keep it short and simple. Plasma has held the reigns for decades as far as picture quality goes. The very best LCD's come close. Honestly with top of the line LCD's it's hard for me to tell which is which which is what I really do for a living so i know very well what to find. In regards down seriously to it plasmas are the most readily useful. They've better viewing angles meaning you can still see a good picture while sitting sideways of the screen. The motion is more fluid making movies and sports smoother and more real life. Also, the blacks are deeper making all the colors more realistic. If you have a pleasant dark home theater room and want the absolute best movie experience get a plasma. But for many people I would recommend [http://www.plasmavsled.com Plasma vs LED] LED. The reason being in general plasmas ARE HEAVY, much more fragile and dimmer than LCD's making plasmas poor options for heavily trafficked and well lit rooms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LCD's are slimmer, lighter and generally brighter making them the best choice for regular tv watchers. The very best of the line LCD's can rival plasmas and appearance great with high detail in a well lit room. Not to mention they truly are much lighter and better to install than plasmas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LED TV's are LCD Tv's with different backlights. Backlighting is the term used for the way LCD's are lit. Regular LCD's use long fluorescent bulbs to provide the backlighting. LIGHT EMITTING DIODE type tv's use Dynamic RGB [http://www.plasmavsled.com LED vs Plasma] which are positioned behind the panel. This LCD TV technology currently offers the best colors, brightness and contrast ratios. You might also need edge lit Leds. The LEDs are on the edges with a special diffussor to even out the light. This arrangement allows for the thinnest possible TV. The bottom line is if you're able to afford it get an [http://www.plasmavsled.com Plasma versus LED] LED t.v.. Their contrast and colors top regular LCD's can rival plasmas. Also, LIGHT EMITTING DIODE TV's have the best energy efficiency of all.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MabreyDobbs931</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>