<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=HollingsheadWorcester471</id>
		<title>HollingsheadWorcester471 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=HollingsheadWorcester471"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=HollingsheadWorcester471&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T12:14:55Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=HollingsheadWorcester471&amp;diff=147903&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>HollingsheadWorcester471:&amp;#32;Created page with 'Scientific people have always enjoyed the idea of artificial intelligence--of a machine having the capacity to think and act by itself. It's a popular theme for novels and flicks…'</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=HollingsheadWorcester471&amp;diff=147903&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-08-23T15:20:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;Scientific people have always enjoyed the idea of artificial intelligence--of a machine having the capacity to think and act by itself. It&amp;#39;s a popular theme for novels and flicks…&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Scientific people have always enjoyed the idea of artificial intelligence--of a machine having the capacity to think and act by itself. It's a popular theme for novels and flicks too. And who folks wouldn't like to own an individual robot you may anticipate our needs and take care of them? I even remember a production from your local planetarium about computers worldwide that networked and synergized their data. At the conclusion of the production this networked laptop or computer commanded, &amp;quot;Let there be light!&amp;quot; along with a new universe was born.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial intelligence has as much definitions as people defining it. For many it is just reliant on a piece of equipment being able to analyze data and then take a suitable action. But I think for the majority of, this means a machine can certainly think, can learn, can make, may come on top of original ideas--that it may act like an individual and stay indistinguishable from a human being in its actions and thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.robertsugar.com/ artificial intelligence london] - If artificial intelligence is simply a machine or even a system functioning on its, a lawn watering that has a moisture meter to understand whether it has rained or otherwise could be artificial intelligence. If it has rained, the sprinklers will not come on before sensor dries out. But this technique may be designed to act like that, and also the only reason it won't act this way is if it malfunctions. In no way is always that intelligent. The machine just isn't thinking at all. It really is doing what it may be developed to do and has no other choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I maintain how the very popular meaning of artificial intelligence--that a machine or system can think, decide, and create--is impossible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, a meaning of intelligence i think a lot of people would agree with: Intelligence is the power to learn; to have experiences that teach the things that work and what doesn't. Then to take that learning and make a move worthwhile by using it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.robertsugar.com/ virtual reality london] - To truly learn something, a machine would need emotions. Individuals need emotions to understand too, and since we've them there's no end as to the we could learn or what we can do with your knowledge. Higher animals also provide emotions and so are capable of learn. The less intelligent a living thing is, the more instinctual it is, meaning it does things because it doesn't always have a choice--because it is less intelligent. Lower organisms like bacteria would not have emotions whatsoever, in terms of we know, and they act similar to machines that have been programmed than like living organisms. They don't behave as when they have a selection. They simply do what their genetic programming means they are do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machines do not have emotions and are not capable of getting them. A person can program a piece of equipment to behave as though it's got emotions, but obviously it won't genuinely have them. A device can be programmed to search the Internet, watch television and listen to radio broadcasting, read books and magazines, and tune in to people speak. It may amass immeasureable data and it can analyze those data and act. But only because it has been programmed to act. It's got plenty of data nevertheless it doesn't worry about them. It couldn't care less if those data sat on its hard drive and absolutely nothing ever became of these. It couldn't care less if a person arrived and erased those data. It would not feel bad for per week because all that effort had come to naught. So any machine or system that have to be developed to act because it doesn't care about acting otherwise, even thought it may be and do amazing things, is not any more intelligent when compared to a lawn sprinkler system having a moisture meter to point out whether or not the sprinklers should run or otherwise. And even though every one of the &amp;quot;knowledge&amp;quot; in the world can be stored on computers, and computers may be networked together to maximise their power, that may never create a God who can produce a new universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We people learn because of emotions. We would like things. We'd like things. Individuals have only 1 instinct: self-preservation. We learn items to keep ourselves alive and comfortable. We sometimes learn because of embarrassment or disappointment. We obtain excited about things and would like to know everything about them. We have talked to 5-year-old children who knew much more about dinosaurs than I am going to ever know or care to know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a Nova program on PBS about separating conjoined twins. One of many twins had a tracheotomy, and so didn't have voice. But she quickly learned to drag her sister's hair in order that her sister did the crying for of these. She also, later, learned to cover her throat along with her hand in order that breath passed through her vocal cords. Each and every time she vocalized this way she smiled, happy with her power to learn something and act intelligently.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.robertsugar.com/ virtual synthesis] - Individuals are authentically intelligent since they can and do learn something totally new on their own, then figure out how to place their knowledge to make use of to preserve themselves, then to help others, then to attempt to make the whole human experience in the world better. There may be a spot in our midst for machines that will analyze data and work as they are programmed, but that is the extent of their worth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Companies, parents, and governments should value people since they're people. Machines will not replace people. Treating people as extensions of technology will never cause success. Letting people use their intelligence and technology to do amazing things will cause outrageous success.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is very good to become a thinking, creating, choosing, feeling, remembering, self-actualizing, improving person. Nothing pleases me in addition to that I'm a person.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HollingsheadWorcester471</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>