<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CordesTrask745</id>
		<title>CordesTrask745 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CordesTrask745"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=CordesTrask745&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-09-07T00:14:31Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=CordesTrask745&amp;diff=151745&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>CordesTrask745:&amp;#32;Created page with 'The significance of Writing High Quality Articles    There's a fallacy online it marketing is just about traffic, nearly volume, nearly the amount of articles you can write. But …'</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?title=CordesTrask745&amp;diff=151745&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-08-24T18:09:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;The significance of Writing High Quality Articles    There&amp;#39;s a fallacy online it marketing is just about traffic, nearly volume, nearly the amount of articles you can write. But …&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The significance of Writing High Quality Articles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a fallacy online it marketing is just about traffic, nearly volume, nearly the amount of articles you can write. But actually, it isn't. Because you aren't writing for the sheer sake of quantity. You are not writing for that sheer sake of having people to your posts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What you really want is for individuals to respond to your posts. And if you are writing poor articles, who's going to respond to your articles? People who do not have money to buy from you, people who don't really need that which you have, people who aren't thinking about buying of your stuff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this sounds familiar? Is among the problems with your list that people aren't buying? Can it be due to the quality of the lead-generation source? You see, the larger quality articles you write, the higher quality prospects you will attract. Much like that. Think about yourself. When you read articles and also you don't learn anything in that article, or else you don't think you can learn from that individual, you don't subscribe, do you? You do not read any more articles with that person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.articles2read.com/ Articles, Best Articles, Articles Directory, Best Article Directory, Top Articles Directory, Education, IAS Articles, General Knowledge Articles, Reading Articles, Articles to Read]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But when instead you read an article and you learn new things, you believe, I can learn from this individual. You look for that person to try and find more articles to read. Perhaps you buy some training from that individual. Because in line with the articles you have read you think that individual can educate you something you don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What exactly about you? Are you writing articles that individuals will want to read more? Or are you writing articles that are so simple that no one may wish to find out more? Your posts should inspire readers to want for more information of your stuff. Your posts should teach things they can't find anywhere else online. You articles should inspire individuals to would like to learn more from you. If they aren't driving people to want to learn more from you, then the reason for writing and submitting articles anyway?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of this, I believe every article you write should inspire your readers to want more from you. To want to read more articles. To begin to think that you're the go-to person in your niche for the topic. So how is the own content creation going to change due to looking over this article? Are your articles going to become deeper?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CordesTrask745</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>